| |
ALL IN THE NAME OF THE NEHRU-GANDHIS
By A.SURYA PRAKASH
In a planned and systematic effort
to gain unfair advantage over other political parties, the Congress Party has named
all major government programmes, projects and institutions in the country after
three members of the Nehru-Gandhi family - Rajiv Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and Jawaharlal
Nehru – who are its icons, and disturbed the level playing field in the electoral
arena.
Over the last 18 years, on a rough estimate about 450 Central and State Government
programmes, projects and national and state level institutions involving public
expenditure of hundreds of thousands of crores of rupees have been named after these
three individuals. While it is the prerogative of a government to name an institution
after a person whom it considers to be a national or state leader, government programmes
which have been initiated to ameliorate the lives of millions of citizens ( like
drinking water, housing and employment guarantee schemes and old age pensions) fall
into an entirely different category. If the nomenclature of these programmes is
not politically neutral, the sanctity of the democratic system would be in jeopardy.
Among the big ticket programmes that have been cleverly named after members of this
family by the Union Government to extract unjust electoral mileage is the Rajiv
Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana (rural electrification programme), which involves
an outgo of Rs 28,000 crore during the Eleventh Plan period (Rs 5500 Cr in fiscal
2008-09).. The drinking water mission, with an allocation of Rs 21,000 crore over
three years (Rs 7300 crore in 2008-09 and Rs 7400 Cr in 2009-10) is also named after
him and is called the Rajiv Gandhi Drinking Water Mission. Other schemes, touching
millions of people, which bear his name are the Rajiv Gandhi National Creche Scheme
for Children of Working Mothers; the Rajiv Gandhi Udyami Mitra Yojana ( to promote
small enterprises); the Rajiv Gandhi Shramik Kalyan Yojana and the Rajiv Gandhi
Shilpi Swasthya Bima Yojana ( both insurance schemes).
Likewise, there are many mega programmes named after Indira Gandhi and Jawaharlal
Nehru by the Centre. For example, there is Indira Awas Yojana. The budgetary allocation
for this programme to house the poor is Rs 7919.00 Cr in 2008-09 and Rs 7914.70
Cr in 2009-10. Also named after her is the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension
Scheme (Rs 3443 Cr in 2008-09). Progrmmes named after Jawaharlal Nehru over the
last two decades are the Jahawarlal Nehru Rojgar Yojana and the Jawaharlal Nehru
Urban Renewal Mission. The Rojgar Yojana, which later metamorphosed into Jawaharlal
Gram Samruddi Yojana was meant to provide employment to millions of unemployed citizens.
The Union Government proposes to spend Rs 50,000 Cr over seven years on the Jawaharlal
Nehru Urban Renewal Mission. (allocation of Rs 10447.98 Cr in 2008-09 and 10713.84
Cr in 2009-10).
Similar Trend in States
This trend is even more apparent in the states, which have vied with each other
to name programmes and schemes after these three members of the Nehru-Gandhi Family
whenever the Congress Party was in power. Here is a sample: Rajiv Gandhi Breakfast
Scheme, Pondicherry; Rajiv Ratna Awas Yojana, Delhi; Rajiv Arogyasri Health Insurance
scheme, Andhra Pradesh; Rajiv Gandhi Computer Literacy Mission, Assam; Rajiv Gandhi
Bridges and Roads Infrastructure Development Programme, Haryana; Rajiv Gandhi Vidyarthi
Suraksha Yojana, Maharastra; Rajiv Gandhi Tourism Development Mission, Rajasthan;
Indira Kranthi Patham Scheme and Indira Jeevitha Bima Pathakam, Andhra Pradesh;
Indira Gandhi Niradhar Yojana and Indira Gandhi Landless Agriculture Labour Scheme,
Maharastra; Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Vivah Shagun Yojana, Haryana; Indira Gandhi
Calf-Rearing Scheme, Andhra Pradesh.
A perusal of these programmes and schemes shows a systematic attempt by the Congress
Party to name every government programme concerning every citizen – man ,woman,
child; every possible circumstance in the life of every citizen – child bearing,
child rearing, education of children, food, education of youth, employment, marriage,
unemployment, destitution, handicap; and every possible challenge flowing out of
lack of infrastructure – drinking water, electricity and housing after just three
members of this political family who are icons of the Congress Party.
Obviously, the plan is to ensure maximum recall of Brand Congress among voters at
every stage in life. Therefore, nothing is left out. The crèche for children of
the working poor is named after Rajiv Gandhi. So is a breakfast scheme for poor
children. The parents need to remember him for a host of other reasons – rural drinking
water, rural electrification or scholarships. Indira Gandhi comes in when the poor
want a house subsidized by the government and you think of Nehru when urban renewal
programmes come into play. The Congress Party has taken its obsession with this
family to such an extent that even calf-rearing schemes are named after them. Shockingly,
even Brand IIM had been tinkered with. While all institutes of management started
by the Centre go under the IIM brand, the Congress Party has mischievously named
the IIM is Shillong as the Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management.
The list of 450 government programmes, schemes, institutions etc named after these
three members of the Nehru-Gandhi family broadly fall into the following categories:
Central government programmes and projects (12), State Government Programmes (52),
Universities and Educational Institutions (98), Ports and Airports (6), Awards,
Scholarships and Fellowships (66), Sports Tournaments, Trophies and Stadia ( 47),
National Parks and Sanctuaries (15), Hospitals and Medical Institutions (39), National
Scientific and Research Institutions, Chairs and festivals (37), Roads, Buildings
and Places (74).
EVEN KABADDI AND ROLLER
SKATING
Apart from violation of basic democratic
norms and electoral law, the naming spree has crossed all limits of decency. Every
major sports tournament has been named after the Nehru-Gandhis, as if no other nobody
else matters, not even the greats in Indian Sports. Among tournaments named after
Rajiv Gandhi are national and international tournaments in football, basketball,
judo, roller skating, beachball, kabaddi, rural cricket, gymnastics, boxing, the
Delhi Marathon and the Kerala Boat Race. If anything is left out, it has been named
after Indira Gandhi and Nehru. The same pattern is repeated in major national parks,
universities, fellowships and scholarships. Such is the obsession of Congress governments
with this family that they name India’s biggest open university after Indira Gandhi
and name fellowships granted there after Rajiv Gandhi. Similarly, the centre for
advanced scientific research in Bangalore is named after Nehru and the science talent
fellowships awarded there are named after Rajiv Gandhi. For long years we are all
familiar with the Fullbright Scholarships. The Manmohan Singh government has ensured
that this is now known as the Fullbright-Jawaharlal Nehru Scholarship! We are unlikely
to see anything so gross even in dictatorships like in North Korea. (Entire List
is in Annexure– I)
This blatant attempt to package and market government programmes run on public money
as munificent offerings from a single family to the people has made a mockery of
the Model Code of Conduct drawn up by the Election Commission for observance by
all political parties.
I have therefore petitioned the Chief Election Commissioner on March 13, 2009 and
requested him to immediately issue directions to the Union Government and to all
the governments in the states and direct them to remove the names of individuals,
who are seen by the people as icons of specific political parties, from all government
programmes and schemes funded by the exchequer and to immediately give these programmes
politically neutral names. Such a direction from the Election Commission will ensure
enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct in letter and spirit and will also be in
consonance with the various directions and instructions issued by the Commission
from time to time.
WHERE IS THE MAHATMA ?
Such is the obsession of the Congress Party with three members of the Nehru-Gandhi
family that even the Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi has been virtually forgotten.
The Congress Party’s contempt for Mahatma Gandhi is best explained by the fact that
just one central scheme – the Mahatma Gandhi Backward Region Development Fund- has
been named after him. Even this tokenism has come as an after thought only in 2007,
almost 60 years after the Mahatma’s assassination. On the other hand, schemes to
promote rural electrification, drinking water, crèche for children and micro and
small industries in rural areas ( each of which was close to the heart of the Mahatma)
are all named after Rajiv Gandhi. Again, the scheme to build houses for the rural
poor (something that would have made the Mahatma proud) is named after Indira Gandhi,
as also the national old age pension scheme. Yet another programme which ought to
have been named after the Mahatma - the greatest Indian of the 20 th Century- is
the Rozgar Yojana which guarantees 100 days of work for the rural unemployed all
over the country. Even this programme was initially named after Jawaharlal Nehru
as also the Urban Renewal Mission (annual budgetary allocation of over Rs 10,000
Crores).
Equally glaring is the omission of many other eminent Indians including Sardar Vallabhai
Patel, India’s first Deputy Prime Minister who undertook the arduous task of integrating
563 princely states into a single nation and Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, who presided over
the committee that drafted our Constitution and embedded basic values of democracy
and social justice. No central programmes have been named after them. Such is the
Congress Party’s determination to name every scheme after members of the Nehru-Gandhi
family that even the National Fellowship Scheme for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled
Tribe students is named after Rajiv Gandhi and not Dr.Ambedkar, the man who waged
a relentless battle to better the lot of the Dalits in India. There are hundreds
of other leaders belonging to various political shades who have made an invaluable
contribution to the building of India, but not a single central government programme
is named after any of them. The list of those ignored is a pretty long one. They
include Rabindranath Tagore, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Bal Gandadhar Tilak, Netaji
Subhas Chandra Bose, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Sarojini Naidu, Jayaprakash Narayan,
Acharya Vinoba Bhave, C.Rajagopalachari, Rajendra Prasad and every other stalwart
of the freedom movement. Also ignored are great saints like Aurobindo and Swami
Vivekananda; Social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Mahatma Phule; great scientists
like C.V.Raman, Homi Bhabha, Vikram Sarabhai and Narlekar and great patriots like
Bhagat Singh and Chandrashekar Azad.
While there are many examples of this kind in the states as well, the most glaring
example, which raises a question is regard to free and fair election is the blatant
advertisement of the Congress Party on the ambulances that provide emergency medical
help all over Andhra Pradesh. These ambulances, which reach every village in the
state in quick time, provide efficient integrated emergency services that cover
medical emergencies, police and fire. The capital expenditure on each ambulance
is Rs 10 lakh to Rs 16 lakhs and the running cost per ambulance is Rs 1.25 lakh
per month. All this expenditure is borne out of public funds drawn from the Union
and State accounts. Yet, it is made out as if these ambulances are a gift from the
Congress Party to the people of the State because every ambulance carries a portrait
of Rajiv Gandhi on both sides of the vehicle with the legend “Rajiv Arogyasri”.
The Congress Party is drawing undue electoral advantage out of this programme, which
is being made to look like a programme of a political party or a private donor.
Gujarat too has ensured full coverage of all its 18080 villages by these ambulances.
But it does not advertise these ambulances as some kind of largesse from the ruling
party.
GOVT SCHEMES MUST HAVE POLITICALLY NEUTRAL NAMES
Many years ago, when the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) was in power at the
Centre, it launched the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana. This nomenclature, as
is obvious, is politically neutral. Several schemes launched by the present government
in Madhya Pradesh also carry politically neutral names and are called Mukhya Mantri
Yojanas. The Election Commission ought to commend this model to all governments
in the larger interests of democracy and to ensure fair and objective conditions
for all political players.
Part VII of the Model Code of Conduct drafted by the Election Commission says “the
party in power whether at the Centre or in the State shall ensure that no cause
is given for any complaint that it has used its official position for the purposes
of its election campaign”. It prohibits ministers from misusing official machinery
“in furtherance of the interest of the party in power”. They are not to issue advertisements
at the cost of the public exchequer or do anything “which may have the effect of
influencing the voters in favour of the party in power”. In other words, the Code
prohibits a party in power from using its “official position” for its election campaign
and this includes anything associated with government – vehicles, personnel, propaganda.
The key injunction is that nothing should be done which would amount to “influencing
the voters in favour of the party in power”. If this be so, how can the commission
possibly allow the ruling Congress Party to name schemes worth over Rs One Lakh
Crores after just three members of a single family who are icons of that political
party?
WHY IS THE ELECTION COMMISSION SILENT?
It is surprising how such a glaring misuse of government machinery and public funds
for partisan political purposes has not caught the attention of the Election Commission
which has always displayed alacrity in disciplining political parties. Given the
commission’s rigid and inflexible approach to even minor violations by other parties,
should it not take immediate steps to correct the imbalance that the Congress Party
has brought about through this Machiavellian device of naming all schemes and programmes
after its icons?
In fact, the commission has specifically stressed the importance of “a level playing
field” among all political parties in several of its orders and decisions. It said
so when a complaint was made against the Union Minister Mr.Arjun Singh in April,
2006. It said the government should not disturb “the level playing field among the
political parties in the election arena”. It said persons in power should not only
uphold the Code of Conduct “but should also be perceived to be doing so”. The question
that now arises is that if every other government scheme or project is named only
after icons of the Congress Party, how can the public “perceive” the ruling party
to be upholding the Code?
In yet another case involving the distribution of tourism department material in
a New Delhi Assembly Constituency in November, 2003, the commission had pulled up
the Union Tourism Minister Mr. Jagmohan for “misusing” government publicity materials.
Equally relevant is the commission’s instructions dated November, 21, 2007 in which
it directed all governments to strictly ensure that all references to politicians
and ministers on the official website of the government should be deleted during
the period of General Elections to the Lok Sabha and the State Legislative Assemblies.
It said individuals associated with a party should not eulogise government achievements
“as personal achievements”. If that is so, how can thousands of crores of public
money spent on government schemes be palmed off as gifts from a single party or
worse, a single family, to the people?
It would therefore be in the fitness of things if the commission issues a direction
to the Union Government and all governments in the states to ensure that the nomenclature
of all schemes and programmes is politically neutral and to delete the names of
members of the Nehru-Gandhi family from these schemes immediately because of the
unfair advantage that this offers to the Congress Party in the election arena. Since
the schedule for the Lok Sabha election has already been announced, the Commission
will have to issue this direction immediately and with the same alacrity it displayed
in respect of other cases in the past.
Post Your Comments
|